|
Fall 2000 |
|
Overall Instructor Rating |
An overall rating of superior was given to the
instructor by 100 percent of the students who responded. |
|
Overall Course Rating |
An overall rating of superior was given to the
course by 100 percent of the students who responded. |
|
Spring 2000 |
|
Overall Instructor Rating |
Of the students who responded, 33 percent gave a rating of superior, and
44 percent gave a rating of above average to the instructor. |
|
Overall Course Rating |
Of the students who responded, 22 percent gave a rating of superior, and
44 percent gave a grade of above average to the course. |
|
Summer
2000 |
|
Overall Instructor Rating |
An overall rating of superior was given by 25 percent of the responding
students, and 50 percent of students rated the instructor as above
average. |
|
Overall Course Rating |
An overall rating of superior was given by 25 percent of the responding
students, and 25 percent of the students gave the course a rating of
above average. |
|
Spring 2001 (Module
1) |
|
Overall Instructor Rating |
Of the students responding, 90 percent gave the instructor a rating of
superior, and 9 percent gave the instructor a rating of above average. |
|
Overall Course Rating |
81 percent of responding students gave the course a rating of superior,
and 18 percent gave it a rating of above average. |
|
Spring 2001 (Module
2) |
|
Overall Instructor Rating |
Of the students responding, 66 percent gave the instructor a rating of
superior, and 33 percent gave a rating of above average. |
|
Overall Course Rating |
An overall rating of superior was given by 33 percent of the students
who responded, and an overall rating of above average was given by 66
percent of the students. |
